Real-World Projects

3 min read

Case studies and examples of Claude Code being used on actual production projects

title: Real-World Projects description: Case studies and examples of Claude Code being used on actual production projects

These case studies showcase how Claude Code has been used to build real applications, demonstrating practical workflows, productivity gains, and best practices learned along the way.

Case Study 1: Claude Insider (This Site!)

Project: Documentation website with AI voice assistant Built With: Claude Code powered by Claude Opus 4.5 Time: Built entirely with AI assistance

What Was Built

Next.js 16 documentation site with 30+ pages
AI voice assistant with ElevenLabs TTS
RAG-powered documentation search
Streaming chat with Claude AI
PWA with offline support

Key Features Developed

| Feature | Claude's Role | Human Effort | |---------|---------------|--------------| | MDX content system | Generated structure | Review & edit | | Voice assistant UI | Full implementation | Testing | | RAG search system | Architecture & code | Integration | | ElevenLabs TTS | API integration | Configuration | | Theme system | CSS implementation | Color choices |

Lessons Learned

Iterative refinement works - Start simple, add features incrementally
Context matters - Better descriptions yield better code
Review is essential - AI code needs human verification
Documentation helps - CLAUDE.md improves consistency

Sample Prompt Used

Text

Build a voice assistant component with:
- Text input for typing questions
- Microphone button for voice input
- Message history display
- Auto-scrolling chat
- Loading states
- Error handling

Use React hooks, TypeScript, and Tailwind CSS.

Case Study 2: E-Commerce API

Project: REST API for online store Stack: Node.js, Express, PostgreSQL Development Time: 2 days (vs estimated 2 weeks)

Requirements

User authentication with JWT
Product catalog with search
Shopping cart functionality
Order processing
Payment integration (Stripe)
Admin dashboard API

How Claude Helped

Day 1: Foundation

Text

Set up Express API with:
- TypeScript configuration
- PostgreSQL with Prisma ORM
- JWT authentication middleware
- Request validation with Zod
- Error handling middleware
- API documentation with Swagger

Day 2: Features

Text

Implement:
- Product CRUD with image upload
- Cart management
- Checkout flow with Stripe
- Order status webhooks
- Admin endpoints with RBAC

Code Quality Metrics

| Metric | Result | |--------|--------| | Test Coverage | 87% | | TypeScript Errors | 0 | | Security Audit | Passed | | Load Test | 1000 req/s |

Key Takeaways

Scaffolding is fast - Project structure in minutes
Boilerplate elimination - Focus on business logic
Best practices built-in - Security, validation, error handling

Case Study 3: CLI Tool for DevOps

Project: Deployment automation CLI Stack: Go, Cobra CLI Purpose: Streamline Kubernetes deployments

The Problem

Manual deployment process:

Update version in multiple files
Build Docker images
Push to registry
Update Kubernetes manifests
Apply to cluster
Verify deployment health

The Solution

Text

Build a Go CLI tool that:
1. Reads deployment config from YAML
2. Bumps semantic version
3. Builds and pushes Docker image
4. Updates K8s manifests with new image
5. Applies changes with kubectl
6. Monitors rollout status
7. Rolls back on failure

Include:
- Interactive prompts for confirmation
- Dry-run mode
- Verbose logging
- Slack notifications

Generated Structure

Text

deploy-cli/
├── cmd/
│   ├── root.go
│   ├── deploy.go
│   ├── rollback.go
│   └── status.go
├── internal/
│   ├── config/
│   ├── docker/
│   ├── kubernetes/
│   └── notify/
├── pkg/
│   └── version/
└── main.go

Results

| Before | After | |--------|-------| | 45 min manual | 5 min automated | | Error-prone | Reliable | | No rollback | Auto-rollback | | No notifications | Slack alerts |

Case Study 4: React Component Library

Project: Shared UI components for multiple apps Stack: React, TypeScript, Storybook Components: 25 reusable components

Component Categories

Layout: Container, Grid, Stack, Divider
Forms: Input, Select, Checkbox, DatePicker
Feedback: Alert, Toast, Modal, Skeleton
Navigation: Tabs, Breadcrumb, Pagination
Data Display: Table, Card, Badge, Avatar

Claude's Workflow

Text

Create a [Component] component with:
- TypeScript props interface
- Variants: [list variants]
- Sizes: sm, md, lg
- Accessibility: ARIA attributes
- Keyboard navigation
- Storybook stories
- Unit tests
- Documentation

Example: Button Component

TSX

// Generated component structure
interface ButtonProps {
  variant?: 'primary' | 'secondary' | 'ghost' | 'danger';
  size?: 'sm' | 'md' | 'lg';
  isLoading?: boolean;
  isDisabled?: boolean;
  leftIcon?: ReactNode;
  rightIcon?: ReactNode;
  children: ReactNode;
  onClick?: () => void;
}

export const Button = forwardRef<HTMLButtonElement, ButtonProps>(
  ({ variant = 'primary', size = 'md', ...props }, ref) => {
    // Implementation with proper accessibility
  }
);

Quality Assurance

Accessibility: WCAG 2.1 AA compliant
Testing: 100% coverage on interactions
Documentation: Storybook with all variants
Performance: Tree-shakeable exports

Case Study 5: Data Pipeline

Project: ETL pipeline for analytics Stack: Python, Apache Airflow, PostgreSQL Data Volume: 10M records/day

Pipeline Requirements

Extract data from multiple sources (APIs, databases, files)
Transform and clean data
Apply business rules
Load into data warehouse
Generate reports
Alert on anomalies

Claude's Contributions

DAG Generation

Python

# Generated Airflow DAG
with DAG(
    'daily_analytics_pipeline',
    schedule_interval='0 2 * * *',
    catchup=False,
) as dag:
    extract_sales = PythonOperator(...)
    extract_users = PythonOperator(...)
    transform = PythonOperator(...)
    load = PythonOperator(...)
    report = PythonOperator(...)

    [extract_sales, extract_users] >> transform >> load >> report

Data Validation

Python

# Generated Pydantic models for validation
class SaleRecord(BaseModel):
    transaction_id: str
    amount: Decimal
    currency: str = 'USD'
    timestamp: datetime

    @validator('amount')
    def amount_positive(cls, v):
        if v <= 0:
            raise ValueError('Amount must be positive')
        return v

Performance Results

| Metric | Before | After | |--------|--------|-------| | Processing Time | 4 hours | 45 min | | Error Rate | 5% | 0.1% | | Manual Intervention | Daily | Weekly |

Common Patterns Across Projects

1. Iterative Development

All successful projects followed:

Text

1. Start with minimal viable feature
2. Test and verify
3. Add complexity gradually
4. Refactor as needed

2. Clear Requirements

Better prompts include:

Specific functionality
Technology constraints
Error handling requirements
Performance expectations

3. Human-AI Collaboration

Text

Claude excels at:        Human adds:
- Boilerplate            - Business logic decisions
- Best practices         - Domain expertise
- Documentation          - Final review
- Test generation        - Integration testing

4. Continuous Refinement

Text

Initial prompt → Generated code → Review → Refine prompt → Better code

Getting Started with Your Project

Step 1: Define Requirements

Text

I'm building a [type of application] that needs to:
1. [Core feature 1]
2. [Core feature 2]
3. [Core feature 3]

Tech stack: [technologies]
Constraints: [any limitations]

Step 2: Start Small

Text

Let's start with [simplest feature].
Create the basic structure with:
- File organization
- Core types/interfaces
- Basic implementation
- Error handling

Step 3: Build Incrementally

Text

Now add [next feature] to the existing code.
Maintain consistency with current patterns.
Include tests for new functionality.

Step 4: Review and Refine

Text

Review the complete implementation for:
- Security vulnerabilities
- Performance issues
- Code consistency
- Missing edge cases

Success Metrics

| Project Type | Typical Time Savings | Quality Impact | |--------------|---------------------|----------------| | Web App | 60-70% | Higher consistency | | API | 50-60% | Better documentation | | CLI Tool | 70-80% | More features | | Component Library | 60-70% | Better accessibility | | Data Pipeline | 50-60% | Fewer errors |

Next Steps

Code Review Tutorial - Review your generated code
Test Generation - Add comprehensive tests
Documentation - Document your project

Edit this page on GitHub